Testing and Monitoring
The camera was set to capture images daily between 07:00 and 15:30 with a 3-minute interval (approx. 170 photos per day). Between intervals, the control module completely disconnects the power to prevent any parasitic drain.
Throughout the test period, temperature and humidity were continuously monitored and logged, both inside the enclosure and at the battery setup. This data logging allows us to correlate the performance of the camera and the LiFePO4 batteries exactly with the actual weather conditions during the test. While the enclosure is not equipped with active heating, this data provides full transparency regarding the test conditions.
External LiFePO4 Battery Results
| Battery (LiFePO4) | Duration (Days) | Photo Count | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12V – 20Ah | 22 days | 3,819 | Completed |
| 12V – 60Ah | 103 days | 17,299 | Completed |
| 12V – 80Ah | 141 days | 23,868 | Completed |
LIVE TEST Nikon D7500 Update
Since October 26, 2025, an additional test has been running with a Nikon D7500 and an 80Ah battery under identical conditions. The test is currently still in full swing, underlining the reliability of the D7500 as a professional successor.
Last update: 2026-02-12 (Day 109 of testing – System still operational)
A full overview will be provided upon completion of the D7500 test.
Analysis and Conclusion
The results show that the Nikon D5600, in combination with the Prorama control module, operates extremely efficiently. By physically powering down the camera between shots, the capacity of the LiFePO4 batteries is utilized to its full potential.
With an autonomy of over 20 weeks on an 80Ah battery, this system provides a solid solution for projects where interim maintenance or battery swaps are not possible. The ongoing test with the D7500 appears to confirm this trend.